Google CEO warns judge a breakup of search empire ‘will have many unintended consequences’

April 30, 2025 Clicktoprints

Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) CEO Sundar Pichai took the witness stand Wednesday at his company’s breakup trial in an attempt to preserve the competitive advantages of a crown jewel: Google Search.

Pichai said government proposals to break up the company, end its exclusive distribution agreements, and force it to share decades of search engine data would provide an inapt way to spur competition.

“It will have many unintended consequences,” Pichai said, according to Bloomberg.

Pichai’s testimony unfolded in the Washington, D.C., federal district court where Google went to trial in 2023 against the US Justice Department. Last August, US District Judge Amit Mehta found Google liable for illegally monopolizing the general search engine market and the market for general search engine text.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai during the press conference after his meeting with Polish PM Donald Tusk at Google for Startups Campus In Warsaw in Warsaw, Poland on February 13, 2025. (Photo by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images) — Google CEO Sundar Pichai in February. (Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images) · NurPhoto via Getty Images

Mehta is now tasked with weighing testimony from Pichai and others in the “remedies” phase of the landmark case before ordering a fix for the monopoly while also balancing advances in artificial intelligence that are forcing an evolution of the traditional online search market.

Pichai described the government’s suggested remedies as “far-reaching” and “extraordinary,” according to reports. The proposals, he added, would make it “unviable” for Google to continue the level of research and development investments in search that it has made for the past 30 years.

The CEO testified that one of the government’s requests for a judge to order Google to sell off its Chrome browser felt like a “de facto divestiture of search” along with the intellectual property that Google developed for more than two decades.

Federal prosecutors view Google’s unsurpassed level of search data amassed through its search monopoly as a threat to emerging search products that rely on AI.

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 31: Judge Amit Mehta, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, speaks during the Justice Department's Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month Observance Program, at the Justice Department, on May 31, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) — Judge Amit Mehta, of the US District Court for the District of Columbia, will decide whether Google’s search empire should be broken up. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images) · Mark Wilson via Getty Images

Google is trying to persuade Mehta that he should reject the DOJ’s proposals to restore competition by forcing it to sell its overwhelmingly dominant Chrome browser and by limiting its use of AI tools to enhance its existing search products.

The DOJ is also asking the judge to block Google from agreements that place Google Search in a default position on internet-connected devices. The government has said it may also seek a forced divestiture of Google’s Android operating system.

The search case is one of two ongoing antitrust litigations initiated by the federal government. In a second antitrust case also in the remedies stage of trial, a federal judge found Google liable for illegally monopolizing two online advertising technology markets.

FILE - Google CEO Sundar Pichai leaves the federal courthouse in Washington, Monday, Oct. 30, 2023. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File) — In October 2023, Google CEO Sundar Pichai left a federal courthouse in Washington, D.C., after testifying in the first stage of a landmark antitrust case against his company. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File) · ASSOCIATED PRESS

Prosecutors allege in the search trial that Google unfairly reinforced the quality of its search business by entering into contracts with powerful search distributors, including Apple (AAPL), that secured Google as their default search engine.

In 2021, Google paid $26 billion for default search placements. The lion’s share went to Apple, which Bernstein analysts have estimated totals somewhere between $18 billion and $20 billion per year.

Google has maintained that its default placement contracts are good for competition and consumers and that the company legally gained its overwhelming dominance in search by offering superior-quality searches compared to its peers.

Pichai testified that Google is working on similar agreements with Apple that would place Google’s next-generation search chatbot, Gemini AI, on iPhones.

At trial in October 2023, Pichai testified that the multibillion-dollar default search engine contracts with companies like Apple, Samsung, and Mozilla were pro-competitive.

Google has said that a Chrome divestment and a requirement to share data with unknown foreign and domestic entities would create personal privacy and national security risks for its users.

The software ecosystem that integrates Gmail, Search, Chrome, and Google Cloud, the company has argued, allows it to survey and detect malicious threats.

The remedies phase is scheduled to run until May 9. No matter what Mehta decides, Google is expected to appeal, and the DOJ can too.